I think there are such antagonisms. I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. Peterson-iek debate - Wikipedia And here applies the same logic to Christ himself. The past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past end of quote. They are both highly attuned to ideology and the mechanisms of power, and yet they are not principally political thinkers. increasingly erratic in the rest of the debates. The statement has some interesting ideas though, including the statement that It has been said of the debate that "nothing is a greater waste of time." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. I would like to refer to a classic Daniel Bell, Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism written back in 1976, where the author argues that the unbounded drive of modern capitalism undermines the moral foundations of the original protestant ethics. The cause of problems which are, I claim, immanent to todays global capitalism, is projected onto an external intruder. What people are saying about Jordan Peterson's upcoming showdown with Peterson, I was interested to learn they'd have a debate. The threat of ecological catastrophe, the consequence of new techno-scientific developments, especially in biogenetics, and new forms of apartheid. On april 19th, the debate was held and live streamed. We will probably slide towards apocalypse, he said. yardstick: In our daily lives, we pretend to desire things which we do not really desire, The Hidden Argument in the Zizek/Peterson Debate, From a - Medium The lesson of todays terrorism is that if there is a god then everything even blowing up hundreds of innocent bystanders is permitted to those who claim to act directly on behalf of god. Postmodernism: History and Diagnosis Transcript Dr. Jordan Peterson 2019-05-17T08:28:01-04:00. it's made of many idea nuggets only tenuously linked to one other although The turn towards culture as a key component of capitalist reproduction and concurrent to it the commodification of cultural life itself are I think crucial moments of capitalism expanded reproduction. So, where does Communism, just to conclude, where does Communism enter here? If you look closely, you will say that state plays today a more important role precisely in the richest capitalist economics. And Peterson agreed with him: It is not obvious to me that we can solve the problems that confront us. They are both self-described radical pessimists, about people and the world. Come here for focussed discussion and debate on the Giant of Ljubljana, Slavoj iek and the Slovenian school of psychoanalytically informed philosophy. Please feel free to correct this document. The experience that we have of our lives from within, the story we tell ourselves about ourselves, in order to account for what we are doing is and this is what I call ideology fundamentally a lie. And they both agreed, could not have agreed more, that it was all the fault of the academic left. The debate itself was framed as a free-spirited competition, "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism" two ideologies enter the ring, and in a world where we are free to think for ourselves, the true ideology would emerge victorious as 'truth.' I can see no threat to free creativity in this program on the contrary, I saw health care and education and so on as enabling me to focus my life on important creative issues. I have included my method and aims in a Note at the end of the transcript. They play the victim as much as their enemies. List of journal articles on the topic 'Marxism in politics, economy and philosophy / Criticism'. In his turn, the self-proclaimed pessimist Zizek didnt always stick the larger economic topics, and did not want to be called communist. Peterson is neither a racist nor a misogynist. Doctor Slavoj iek is as philosopher. authors with occasional bridges being thrown accross. The tone of the debate was also noted to be very Zizek's opening statement is probably the most interesting part of the debate. [Scattered Audience applause and cheers]Both Doctor iek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debatewe hopewill transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame SLAVOJ IEK: . Die Analyse dieser Figur findet mit starkem Bezug zur Etablierung By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. [, : Thank you. Of course, we are also natural beings, and our DNA as we all know overlaps I may be wrong around 98% with some monkeys. The recent debate between Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson lived up to the hype. News About Presidential Debate - DEBATE JKW And that was the great irony of the debate: what it comes down to is that they believe they are the victims of a culture of victimization. They didnt understand what is happening to them with military defeat, economic crisis, what they perceived as moral decay, and so on. EL DEBATE DEL SIGLO: Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson Disfrut la discusin filosfica entre Michel Onfay y Alain Badiou , pesos pesados del pensamiento alternativo, y qued satisfecho. Really? them, of all things, to French cuisine) are also worth a listen/read. All these antagonisms concern what Marx called commons the shared substance of our social being. In totalitarian states, competencies are determined politically. Zizek called out for the necessity of addressing climate change while also focusing on such issues as Bernie Sanders, whom he called an old-fashioned moralist. Zizek sees Sanders as being unfairly portrayed as a radical. In such times of urgency, when we know we have to act but dont know how to act, thinking is needed. Does Donald Trump stand for traditional values? Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate Current Affairs To cite this article: Ania Lian (2019): The Toronto Debate: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek on Ethics and Happiness, The European Legacy, DOI: 10.1080/10848770.2019.1616901 Canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender, "Jordan Peterson, Slavoj Zizek each draw fans at sold-out debate", "The 'debate of the century': what happened when Jordan Peterson debated Slavoj iek", "How Anti-Leftism Has Made Jordan Peterson a Mark for Fascist Propaganda", "There Is No One to Cheer for in the Potential Battle Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek", "Why do people find Jordan Peterson so convincing? So, how to act? But, a danger lurks here, that of a subtly reversal: dont fall in love thats my position with your suffering. The rest of the debate was (if memory serves) also interesting, but it gets even My main purpose with this text is not to prove that Marx was right, but rather that Peterson's and Zizek's analysis are shortsighted and yet still give valuable insight about the state of Neither can face the reality or the future. agreement (as well they should, adopting neither deluded far-left or far-right opinions), and that the debate was cordial, even mutually admirative at times. IQ, Politics, and the Left: A Conversation with Douglas Murray Transcript Nina Paley: Animator Extraordinaire Transcript Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript Along the same lines, one could same that if most of the Nazi claims about Jews they exploit Germans, the seduce German girls were true, which they were not of course, their anti-Semitism would still be a pathological phenomenon, because it ignored the true reason why the Nazis needed anti-Semitism. Web november 12, 2022 advertisement the nigerian factcheckers . Forced marriages and homophobia is ok, just as long as they are limited to another country which is otherwise fully included in the world market. First, a brief introductory remark. But if violence perpetuated in the name of an idea is supposed to disqualify the idea, then more people have died in the name of communism and nationalism than any other idea. Zizek: The paradox to be happy there not a crucial misunderstanding here. 2 define the topic, if . Peterson and Zizek Debate - transcribed by John Li - johnmhli@berkeley.edu - 916 623 5512 - https://chicago.academia.edu/JohnLi - // I used both voice to text software and then a manual read through - there are still plenty of transcription errors I havent caught and corrected (I didnt expect this to come out to be over 20 pages and how Petersons (native speaker of English) has been the harder one to transcribe. This is a pity, because Peterson made an argument I have seen many times, one which is incredibly easy to beat." Not that I was disappointed. Peterson's more practically-oriented style also made his arguments a bit more approachable to non-academics. Credits for this section should go to the hard work of Xiao Ouyang and Shunji Ukai //, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUhYdqB2Jh7CU5Le0XgktKaoXQmnTdbv0-_kE5BQL6Q/edit?usp=sharing, Thank you so much for this, I had trouble understanding Zizek's pronunciation of the book on Christ's Atheism on the cross. What if secretly they know she would kill her child again. So, I dont accept any cheap optimism. This is why egalitarianism itself should never be accepted at its face value. The same goes also from godless, Stalinist Communists they are the ultimate proof of it. Peterson's opening remarks were disappointing even for his fans in the audience. Having watched it (video), I regret to inform you it was neither of those The controversial thinkers debated happiness, capitalism and Marxism in Toronto. In fact, this was a surprise for many, but both men tended to agree a whole lot, iek & Peterson Debate - Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (transcript While the two take different political stances, both have been known to rail against political correctness and found that issue in common. norswap The Zizek Peterson Debate Most of the attacks on me are now precisely from left liberals. Both of these men know that they are explicitly throwbacks. In spite of protests here and there, we will probably continue to slide towards some kind of apocalypse, awaiting large catastrophes to awaken us. Regarding how the debate was receiving, judging from Twitter and some quick You can find a transcript of it here. Equality can also mean and thats the equality I advocate creating the space for as many as possible individuals to develop their different potentials. No. Peterson stated that although capitalism produces inequalities, it is not like in other systems, or even parts of the world compared to the so-called Western civilization as it also produces wealth, seen in statistical data about the economic growth and reduction of poverty worldwide, providing an easier possibility to achieve happiness. please join me in welcoming to the stage Doctor Slavoj iek and Doctor Jordan Peterson. Globalnews.ca your source for the latest news on presidential debate. Debate Peterson-iek - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre They argued whether capitalism or communism would be the best economic and political system. They can develop into a permanent obsession sustained by obstacles that demand to be overcome in short, into a properly metaphysical passion that preserves the biologically rhythm, like endlessly prolonging satisfaction in courtly love, engaging in different perversions and so on and so on.